booklogging

It'd be a useful discipline for me to log and write about the books I read. A blog might help in that discipline and -who knows?- may be useful to ... you?

31.5.07

 

Christ the One and Only. A Global Affirmation of the Uniqueness of Jesus Christ.

This book does what it says in the subtitle. It is global in that the contributors are Christians from various parts of the world: South America, Asia, Europe. The pieces are united in making affirmation of Christ's uniqueness in the face of a religiously plural world. The general tone is evangelical and much of the energy of most of the contributors seems to be found in 'preaching to the choir'. On the whole it is not making a case for exclusivism or inclusivism (these being the normal evangelical positions on multi-faith matters) so much as helping readers to feel that these positions are what they should be holding onto: it is largely an exercise in bolstering the party lines rather than exploring the facts of religious pluralism and attempting to do theology with them. There is another strand to the collection which is exemplified by the final essay on Buddhism which is outlining points of contact to better enable Christians to explain the gospel.

From the foregoing, you would be correct to infer that this book, on the whole does not give readers the tools to enter the debates about religious pluralism going on globally; it is more concerned to secure readers in an existing set of commitments. That said, the first chapters which outline historical and basic theological data are probably useful introductory texts for those beginning to think about the issues in a more sustained way. However, the book on the whole does not signal ways forward in handling probably one of the more common and perhaps urgent questions that this arena of enquiry throws up, that of the fate of the unevangelised. One essay does deal with this, but not in such a way as to give a survey of the approaches which might be useful to those trying to gain depth in their thinking about the matter.

There are a handful of contributions which seemed to me to deserve a wider hearing; Veli-Matti Kärkäinen deftly handles Barth and other more contemporary theologians in thinking about the Trinity. And writing on Christianity in relation to Judaism, Ellen Cherry produces a very thought-provoking piece that challenges the Christian reader very strongly and really provokes engagement with the issues and leads one to see more clearly the logics of both sides of the divide. Ng Kam Weng's essay about Muslim-Christian matters makes very good use of the insights of Kenneth Cragg and draws out some of the key issues from a Christian perspective in such a way as to make this essay something I would consider putting into the hands of those beginning to enter into intelligent debate with Muslims as a way to begin to orientate themselves (pun intended!). I felt that the editor's piece on relating to Buddhism was good at introducing the basics of Buddhism and the potential difficulties of sharing the gospel with Buddhists, but I was concerned that the nature of desire in each respective thought-world was too easily assimilated and so an opportunity was lost to explore an important set of issues around the nature of human beings in theistic and non-theistic systems.

I would have liked to have seen more attention in the collection as a whole to the issues of dialogue and evangelical responses to it. Relatedly, there is no well-developed consideration of the ethics, rhetorics or manners of interfaith encounter, and given the basic apparent posture of the complete collection, that is an omission that can be ill afforded in a book aiming at a global affirmation of anything. It would also have been good to have at least given pointers to the wider debate around inclusivism and exclusivism. However, it may be that to do the latter would risk alienating a large potential market.

In sum, a handful of the pieces are definitely worth having to refer to and to help introduce some of the issues and to help one appreciate the internal logic of non-pluralist Christian positions. It won't on the whole help to open up the wider and perhaps more important global debates to evangelical readers, however.

Labels: , ,


Comments: Post a Comment



<< Home

Archives

July 2004   August 2004   September 2004   October 2004   November 2004   May 2005   June 2005   September 2005   March 2006   April 2006   May 2006   June 2006   August 2006   May 2007   July 2007   October 2007   December 2007   January 2008   August 2008   November 2008   January 2010  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?